Pentel PG series, exploratory of PMG and PG5 releases

There’s a reason why Pentel has over 125 post tags on Knockology. It’s probably the most popular mechanical pencil maker on the planet. One can get lost within this brand alone, given the breadth of what has been released over the years since the 1960’s.

@nimrodd did a phenomenal job in creating an interactive compendium for Pentel pencil models, HERE. And of course, major thanks to @Knockologist for his involvement and hosting!

I’m by no means a prolific Pentel mechanical pencil collector, especially when looking at some of the veteran members here with such storied collections. I’m just happy to dabble… and occasionally turn up something interesting to share. And while Jimmy’s book does a great coverage of all the Pentel models, I thought I’d share a little more on what I’ve come across in my narrow exploration.

PG = Pentel Graph series launched in the 1970s. The lower cost plastic bodied line featured PG2, PMG, PG4, PG5, and PG7. Why “PMG” instead of PG3? The reason was to differentiate from the other models, as this one had a special feature–a protective steel collar to guard the tip. “M” is for “Mechanica,” as a nod to the 1968 released Pentel Mechnica. I think the reason why that word was chosen is due to the mechanical control of the extendable and retractable protective sleeve. And while the PMG doesn’t have that mechanism, it still enjoys the same protection. Pentel smartly designed it such that the sleeve detaches from the front and docks on the rear for safe keeping. I left mine docked here, but you can see it removed in this photo from Nimrodd’s catalog: https://pentelidbook.nyc3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/PMG.jpg

I don’t possess the full PG line, having only the PMG and PG5, as well as the Mechanica. You can see details of each model on Nimrodd’s fantastic online Pentel Identification Book, 1970s section.


There were 3 different releases for the PMG. Series PHOTO. I have two of them, from the 3rd batch. And even with those, there are some very minor differences (internally). One has a mold code of 10, and the other is 21.

I had wanted to get the first series release of the PMG, but it’s too hard to find now and seller asking prices are too high for what I consider reasonable. I bought both of mine off of Yahoo Auctions Japan. The first was a good condition user (bought about 6 years ago), while the second is a near NOS condition example with sticker that I picked up recently.

I’d bought a PG5 a good 6 or 7 years ago. I prefer it to the P20x series as I just like the grip design and find it more visually appealing. They’re so cheap now on Amazon USA, that I grabbed one to add enough in my cart for free shipping. It was interesting to compare releases, as they have some differences (but operation is identical). The old one doesn’t have a mold code, while the newer one does. You can see the white screw thread coupler has yellowed a little on the old one.

In case anyone is curious, that long metal cone you see was something I picked up from an art supply store. It works as an excellent guard for the front half. It has a gap running up about 1/3rd of the way on one side, as a control for flexing.

Mold codes and other embossed lettering:

Since Pentel made a limited edition release of the P20x series, I’m hoping one day they do the same for the PG series. Since the PG5 is still in production, it wouldn’t be hard to make the PG2, PMG, and PG7 variants.

6 Likes

Those are not production batch numbers, but the mold marks (cavity number) in the mold.

4 Likes

OK… is there any correlation to the cavity number for a grouping of production batches? Or is it random?

1 Like

I am not sure on the PG pencils, but on the P200 pencils the Gen 1 mold had 8 cavities numbered 1-8, the Gen 2-3 mold for the P205 & P209 had 10 cavities numbered 9-18. Other generations had different number ranges.

OK, thanks. I was thinking that maybe there was some date significance to the code, but seems not. Probably just sort of an internal tracking number that is meaningless to any of us.

Look on the opposite side of the Old one. The mold mark is always on the Pentel Japan cutout, not on the Graph Pencil cutout.

I wonder if Pentel actually had a full vision for the entire Graph Pencil line when they released the original in 1965 before improving it into the Graph II and eventually the PG5 in 1972. That’s 7 years in-between!

And as far as I’ve managed to research, the order of releases was pretty staggered:

1965 - Original Graph Pencil soon after Pentel’s debut of 0.5mm polymer leads
1968 - Pentel Mechanica / MEC debuts as world’s first 0.3mm system
1970 - PMG as lower cost option to 3000 yen MEC; MEC2-5 as 0.5mm expansion of 3000-yen flagship; Graph II as product update to better match the PMG and as an alternative to the MEC 0.5? Production ends 1971.
1972 - PG5 ← Change in number implies road map and production issues were sorted out
(1973 - PS1042 0.2mm comes out 2 years after Newman’s Super 2)
1976 - PG4 ← What prompted the development of 0.4 in the 4 years following PG5?
1977 - PG7 ← Why so late? Why not soon(er) after PG5?
1981? - PG2 ← Why 8 years to develop from 1973?

Phew!

2 Likes

You’re right. I’m an idiot. Somehow I was looking on the same side for both the PMG and PG5, and the orientation on the older PG5 was rotated around, relative to the clip on the others. The mold code is 17.

Really fascinating. Thanks for typing all of this out. Now, it makes sense regarding the PMG. This was before the PG# system nomenclature was made. And since the PMG was considered the more affordable version of the Mechanica, they kept the PMG designation instead of changing it over to PG3.

Yes, it sure is strange why the PG2 came out in 1981, since the 0.2 mm size had been in production with a few vendors (like Newman) for some years.

2 Likes

Well, you looked at them the way most people would, based on the orientation of the text, or the clip in the case of no text. When I get pencils with moveable clips, I always orient them the way I want to see them.

Where did you find the date for the PG7? I could never find a date for it.

So cool! I love this series of pencils. Thank you for compiling and sharing this info!

1 Like

I thought I’d left academia and Harvard citations behind when I completed my bachelor’s degree lol…

Seriously, it was either a previous edit of the Pentel Japan Wiki page, a long lost blog or Twitter post. For some reason, Japanese collectors sometimes shut everything down and disappear…

The other consideration is the circumstantial evidence in the collection of Pentel catalogs. The Pentel of America1976 catalog lists the Graph Pencil (PG5) as well as the PMG but the smaller subtext where other lead sizes are usually listed is left blank. Perhaps the PG4 had not yet been added to the SKUs for the USA.

Subsequently, we see the Pentel USA 1979 catalog and it lists the PMG, PG4, PG5 and PG7. So, circumstantially, the PG7 was introduced after 1976 but no later than 1979. And going by the ‘business as usual’ practices, the PG7 would have been introduced in Japan well before it was added to the USA catalog?

Anyway, that’s my train of thought.

1 Like

That’s a good point. I wonder how many of them have gone extinct up to now. I also wonder if hosting sites have rules about page owner activity… like if it’s not touched after “X” years, they consider the account expired.

I haven’t seen Monogusa (Hakubutsukan) post in a long while, like about 8 years. But they have a YAJ account, as I’ve seen listings with that seller name, and not that long ago (2023, I believe).
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/monogusa-hakubutsukan/

The Wayback Machine doesn’t seem to thoroughly crawl all sites with a history of some notable traffic. And one problem is that image retention is constricted. They’ll not save a full resolution image, reducing it to “junk” compression.

2 Likes