A small showcase of some recent vintage TOMBOW acquisitions

Thanks to Knockology member provided catalog screenshots, I finally have some model numbers I’d long missed.

The most popular of the MONOTECH line is the 1000 series. It’s kind of a “rounded” rOtring 500. Very nice quality. Super smooth mechanism. The 500 is notably less popular, though and interesting curiosity of design. A metal knurled grip mated to a squared off rectangular plastic body. The notable weird element is the lead hardness wheel. Most makers have long gone with the selector that orbits the circumference of the pencil, either on the body or on the eraser cap. This obtrusive plastic wheel is of course very easy to select, but for some odd reason TOMBOW made the numbering raised and unpainted. They should’ve stamped it into the plastic. As such, in low light, it’s very hard to see the selected hardness. Kind of useless if you ask me. I think what I’d do in practice is to paint the selections I’d often choose and leave it at that. Anyway, I had just one of these in all black, in the 0.7 mm lead size, and contemplated trying to collect the whole lead size range. I’m just not enamored enough with the design to do so… but the 2.0 mm size has always intrigued me and so an opportunity came up to get one on the (relative) cheap.

I cheated a little here… as the SH-1500LP in 0.3 mm was bought way earlier last year. The newer acquisition was the SH-1500LP in 0.5 mm. It came in a drafting kit with various compasses and templates. While my first love for the torpedo design started with Uchida, TOMBOW’s design always grabbed at me… and I finally got both sizes. Frankly, the going market prices are unrealistic for the actual product, IMHO. But it’s the rarity in play. And that gentle torpedo shape is just so damned… sexy.

Next up is the brushed steel EXTA with gold accents that has not gotten much love. I guess the colorway combo is off putting for a lot of collectors. But I like it. It’s very well made. I now have a few, so I’m half-tempted to take one and sand off the gold plating on the clip and nose cone to see how it might look.

Moving over… there’s 2 Keshiman pencils, one near mint with sticker and one with signs of use. These are really well made and a little heavier than you might expect. AFAIK there’s no other twist eraser pencil out there made fully out of metal. And because of that weight, the lead pipe guide is a bit vulnerable like the rOtring 600. Sadly, if you drop and bend it, and can’t fix it, TOMBOW does not have replacement parts. This model came out in 1982! And I believe it ended in 1988. I find it remarkable how many in very good condition have survived. They used to be pretty commonly found, but have recently started to become scarce. I should note that the eraser extension mechanism is excellent. Very smooth. And it’s easy to replace eraser cores. The original light blue one is “extinct” and is slightly smaller than the current MONO eraser made by TOMBOW, and you can sand it down a little to fit. I did so. Worked like a charm.

The next one is the SH-1000 AV. I took a chance on this, knowing very little about it. Someone on Reddit said they got one and that it was quite decent so I grabbed one in original box. It’s certainly decent. The click mechanism is a touch loud. But I love the rubber grip. It’s reminiscent of the OHTO Gripper, but better.

Lastly, the TRAD. I’d long wondered what it meant. Initials? Like, “Tombow Righteous Architects & Draftsman”? :smirk::crazy_face: Nah. It’s actually quite simple. TOMBOW wanted this to be regarded like a tribute to “traditional” writing instruments. It has a thoughtful sliding pipe guide. It’s lightweight. It comes in two stately colors–silver and a kind of gunmetal. It has a large beefy clip. And inside is a rather large eraser, more than twice the size of your usual emergency eraser. TOMBOW was thoughtful enough to make a ballpoint companion for the mechanical pencil. They’re pretty decent but not really sought after, so you can periodically pick them up for good prices in NOS condition.

8 Likes

I only have the 0.5mm of the sh-1500 LP. It and the 0.3mm (more so the 0.3mm) had been atop my “grail-list” when it was originally created.

I mention the above due to: after acquiring the 0.5mm, I was astonished it wasn’t simply a full-metal version of its’ cheaper relative “1000” version (torpedo style, black grip-silver body). Instead, I opened the package to receive an MP that was devastatingly huge and unbearable to use. I was quite heartbroken…. My interest in the 0.3mm became intangible, simply non-existent…. Until THIS post where they are side by side…

It may simply be the lighting or (insert any type of possible devastating visual truth…. But…, is it just me? Or is the 0.3mm slimmer than the 0.5mm…?

2 Likes

The width of both SH-1500LP is about the same. The 0.3 mm looking more slender is an optical illusion, because of the longer taper of the front section. The “bulb” of the torpedo is slightly longer on the 0.3 mm. I think also the silver collar for the lead hardness indicator being silver helps make it look slimmer. I’m kind of surprised that you call the width “unbearable.” It seems rather normal-feeling to me. I’ll have to take some measurements of that and a few others for comparison.

I am quite curious, and since you mentioned that in your post… In a direct comparison between, say, an Uchida Drawing Sharp D (highest peak of torpedo drafters, in my opinion) and the Tombow SH-1500 LP, what is the ultimate outcome? Who wins the race?

Also, the Monotech 500 is a fantastic series, and I always find it amazing how the square profile fits surprisingly well within one’s hand. I got a 0.3 many years ago, and has proven to be one of the best thin lead drafters I own; then the opportunity came to get a 2.00 mm, and it delivered as well. I ended up acquiring a set containing the 0.7mm too and thus, if there are no 0.4 or other unusual diameters, I should now have the full range. I have to say I am truly “appointed” (:grin:) by this product line, and by how easily it surpassed even series like the rOtring 500 or 600 one; the balance seems somehow impeccable, and even the wheel has its own charm, regardless of its actual usefulness.

PS: Thanks for further cementing my desire to get a Tombow torpedo. :smiley:

2 Likes

Good question. Well, the curious bit about Uchida is that they employ two different lead advance techniques–twist or knock–depending on the model. I don’t have any of the KN (knock) versions. And since the SH-1500LP is a knock… I can’t make a really fair comparison on that alone. However… TOMBOW added a lead hardness indicator (Uchida doesn’t have it). Build quality wise, they’re very comparable. But I think the Uchida is a little more vulnerable. The body tube is a thinner metal, prone to dents… so you have to be careful (and respectful). Appearance wise? TOMBOW is dressed to go to a business or engineering meeting. The Uchida is ready to hit the elite evening party circuit, especially with the Drawing Sharp D and E. :smile:

1 Like

Thanks for sharing your experience on the MONOTECH 500. You make very good points and I have to say that I agree about the usability. It is weighted nicely. The body shape is terrific for anti-roll and despite the shape it does work in the hand with rotation. In terms of use, I’d seen a number of used examples on YAJ with badly worn grips, seemingly worse than a used rOtring 600. So maybe the black anodizing isn’t as good. But then… the MONOTECH 500 has a silver knurled grip version which would mask the usage wear. My only real disappointment is that ridiculous lead hardness wheel. Notice… TOMBOW abandoned it with the 1000, and never went back to it. I know when I’ve written with the 500, I’ve consciously felt that wheel… distracting me. I don’t know if it could be pulled off safely (not breaking anything). Anyway, that’s just my pet peeve. But I do like the overall aesthetics and the mechanism seems quite good, especially for the price point.

2 Likes

The problem with the wheel device for lead degree display is that the various grades that are molded as raised letters… is NOT legible at a glance. A rare functionality miss for Tombow. I wonder how that design decision passed muster.

2 Likes

Unfortunately I have a strong way with words when my “ideal” hasn’t been achieved :/. It being completely different from its’ ¥1000 counterpart was something I never expected.

It is an AMAZINGLY built, quality MP. Was simply surprised once it was in hand. Your description of the 0.3 has only made me want to take the plunge once again.

Thank you for the post, as always :grin:

1 Like

I took out my digital caliper:

TOMBOW SH-1500LP : 9.38 mm at widest, tapering down to 8.25 mm.
Staedtler 925-85: 9.12 mm at widest (9.10 mm at least, reverse taper).
Pentel Mechanica: 8.45 mm at widest (no real taper until very end, after grip)
Faber Castell Tk-matic: 8.27 mm at widest.
rOtring 800: 8.3 mm at widest, then tapers down to about 8.1 mm.

Basically, I’d say the SH-1500LP has a nominal width difference compared to other classic vintage drafter mechanical pencils.

Btw, I measured both the 0.3 and 0.5 mm SH-1500LP. Same width, same taper. I believe the 925-95 has the same grip diameter as the 925-85, but I can’t confirm–mine is presently misplaced. But as you can see, just a very tiny bit more narrow than the SH-1500LP.

1 Like

If we only take into account the Uchida Drawing Sharp KN (I happen to have one, while I have no specimens from the twistaction E-series, save for an old Kent Drawing Sharp), I confirm that the internals are a bit more flimsy, and offer an image of slightly lower robustness.

The Uchida Drawing Sharp D is another story: sharp as a tack, solid, impeccable, charming, and in spite of its clearly unusual shape, delightful to use. This is why I plan to acquire the Tombow someday, just to make a comparison, and possibly settle for the ultimate “torpedo-shaped” MP. I think the Uchida D will be very hard to beat, but who knows? :slight_smile: